Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
Approved by OMB
3060-0386 (July 2002)
FOR FCC USE ONLY
 
Engineering STA

Read Instructions/FAQ before filling out form

FOR COMMISSION USE ONLY
FILE NO.

BSTA - 20130605AAA
Section I - General Information
1. Legal Name of the Applicant
DEEPAK VISWANATH
Mailing Address
P.O. BOX 286

City
E. ELMHURST
State or Country (if foreign address)
NY
Zip Code
11369 -
Telephone Number (include area code)
7187848555
E-Mail Address (if available)
FCC Registration No
0022171276
Call Sign
WDVB-CD
Facility ID Number
168834
2. Contact Representative (if other than licensee/permittee)
SCOTT CINNAMON
Firm or Company Name
LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT C. CINNAMON, PLLC
Mailing Address
1250 CONNECTICUT AVE., NW
SUITE 200, # 144

City
WASHINGTON
State or Country (if foreign address)
DC
ZIP Code
20036 -
Telephone Number (include area code)
2022165798

E-Mail Address (if available)
SCOTT@CINNAMONLAW.COM
3. Purpose:
Engineering STA
Extension of Existing Engineering STA
Legal STA
Extension of Existing Legal STA         
4. Service: DC 
5. Community of License:
City: EDISON     State: NJ
6. If this application has been submitted without a fee, indicate reason for fee exemption (see 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1114):
Governmental Entity Noncommercial Educational Licensee/Permittee Other
N/A (Fee Required)
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Ensure that the specifications below are accurate. Contradicting data found elsewhere in this application will be disregarded. All items must be completed. The response "on file" is not acceptable.
TECH BOX
7.1. Channel:
23
7.2.
Antenna Location Coordinates: (NAD 27)
Latitude:    
Degrees 40 Minutes 45 Seconds 16.6     North     South

Longitude: 
Degrees 73 Minutes 55 Seconds 34     West     East
7.3. Antenna Structure Registration Number:
Not Applicable    [Exhibit 44]                       Notification filed with FAA
7.4.
Antenna Location Site Elevation Above Mean Sea Level: 12.7  meters
7.5.
Overall Tower Height Above Ground Level: 27.4  meters
7.6.
Height of Radiation Center Above Ground Level: 27.4  meters
7.7.
Maximum Effective Radiated Power: 0.1  kW
7.8.
Transmitter Output Power:  0.003  kW  
7.9. a.Transmitting Antenna:   
Before selecting Directional "Off-the-Shelf", refer to "Search for Antenna Information" under CDBS Public Access (http://licensing.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/cdbs_pa.htm). Make sure that the Standard Pattern is marked Yes and that the relative field values shown match your values. Enter the Manufacturer (Make) and Model exactly as displayed in the Antenna Search.
   
Nondirectional Directional "Off-the-shelf" Directional composite

Manufacturer SCA     Model PRTV

b. Electrical Beam Tilt:  degrees Not Applicable

Directional Antenna Relative Field Values: N/A (Nondirectional or Directional "Off-the-shelf")
Rotation (Degrees): 142   No Rotation

Degrees Value Degrees Value Degrees Value Degrees Value Degrees Value Degrees Value    
0 1 10 0.808 20 0.43 30 0.165 40 0.09 50 0.059
60 0.052 70 0.049 80 0.049 90 0.047 100 0.045 110 0.046
120 0.046 130 0.04 140 0.038 150 0.03 160 0.028 170 0.026
180 0.025 190 0.026 200 0.028 210 0.03 220 0.038 230 0.04
240 0.046 250 0.046 260 0.045 270 0.047 280 0.049 290 0.049
300 0.052 310 0.059 320 0.09 330 0.165 340 0.43 350 0.808
Additional 
Azimuths

Relative Field Polar Plot

NOTE:    In addition to the information called for in this section, an explanatory exhibit providing full particulars must be submitted for each question for which a "No" response is provided.
10. Out-of-channel Emission Mask:     Simple                                                Stringent
CERTIFICATION
11.
Please explain in detail the "extraordinary circumstances" which warrant temporary operations at variance from the Commission's Rules. In addition, please specify 1)the specific rules and/or policies from which the applicant seeks temporary relief; 2) how the public interest will be furthered by grant; and 3) the expected duration of the STA and the licensee's plan for restoration of licensed operation. If requesting variance with other than authorized technical facilities, please specify the exact facilities sought.
[Exhibit 45]
12.
Anti-Drug Abuse Act Certification. Applicant certifies that neither applicant nor any party to the application is subject to denial of federal benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862.
Yes No

I certify that I have prepared Engineering Data on behalf of the applicant, and that after such preparation, I have examined and found it to be accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Name
GREGORY L BEST
Relationship to Applicant (e.g., Consulting Engineer)
CONSULTING ENGINEER
Signature
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
05/08/2013
Mailing Address
9223 N. MANNING AVENUE
City
KANSAS CITY
State or Country (if foreign address)
MO
Zip Code
64157 -
Telephone Number (include area code)
8167922913
E-Mail Address (if available)
GBCONSULTING@KC.RR.COM

I hereby certify that the statements in this application are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are made in good faith. I acknowledge that all certifications and attached Exhibits are considered material representations.

Typed or Printed Name of Person Signing
DEEPAK VISWANATH
Typed or Printed Title of Person Signing
MANAGING MEMBER
Signature
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/01/2013

WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS ON THIS FORM ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, SECTION 1001), AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION LICENSE OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (U.S. CODE, TITLE 47, SECTION 312(a)(1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (U.S. CODE, TITLE 47, SECTION 503).



Exhibits
Exhibit 44
Description:
REASON FOR NO ASRN

THE PROPOSED FACILITY IS ONLY 90 FEET TALL AND DOES NOT FAIL ANY SLOPE CRITERIA AS TESTED WITH THE FCC TOWAIR PROGRAM.

Attachment 44


Exhibit 45
Description:
REASON FOR STA REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY OPERATION WITH STRINGENT EMISSION MASK

AN STA REQUEST IDENTIFIED IN STA FILE NUMBER 20130214ABZ WAS GRANTED. HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT FOR THE STA IS UNABLE TO OPERATE AT THE PROPOSED LOCATION. THEREFORE A NEW LOCATION IS SOUGHT. THE PRIMARY REASON FOR THE STA HAS NOT CHANGED. THE REASON FOR THE STA IS TO CORRECT SOME DIFFICULTY WITH SIGNAL RECEPTION OF THE PRIMARY WDVB CHANNEL 23 SIGNAL IN THE AREA WHERE THIS FACILITY IS PROPOSED. THE MEASURED SIGNAL STRENGTH FROM THE WDVB DIGITAL SIGNAL IS BELOW THE THRESHOLD OF RECEPTION LEVEL IN THIS AREA. THE PROPOSED DIGITAL FACILITY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CONTOUR OF THE PRIMARY WDVB DIGITAL SIGNAL. THUS THE PROPOSED FACILITY IS REQUESTED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SIGNAL IN THIS AREA UNTIL A BETTER SOLUTION FOR THE PRIMARY DIGITAL FACILITY CAN BE DEVELOPED. IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO PHYSICALLY MOVE THE PRIMARY ANTENNA SO THAT THE PRESENTLY UNSERVED AREA ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE MANHATTAN AND QUEENS NEW YORK AREA RECEIVES A STRONGER SIGNAL. HOWEVER, THAT IS NOT PRESENTLY FEASIBLE. THE APPLICANT RECOGNIZES THAT IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE PROPOSED DIGITAL FACILITY MAY CAUSE SELF-INTERFERENCE TO WDVB BUT WILL ACCEPT THE INTERFERENCE IF IT OCCURS. AS EVIDENCED BY THE ATTACHED INTERFERENCE STUDY, NO INTERFERENCE TO ANY OTHER PERMANENT AUTHORIZATIONS OR APPLICATIONS IS PREDICTED FROM THE PROPOSED FACILITY.

THE PROPOSED FACILITY CONSISTS OF A TYPE CERTIFIED DIGITAL TRANSMITTER USING A STRINGENT EMISSION MASK FILTER, APPROXIMATELY 90 FEET OF 1/2' HELIAX TRANSMISSION LINE, AND A SCALA PRTV ANTENNA TO GENERATE 100 WATTS OF EFFECTIVE RADIATED POWER.

AN INTERFERENCE ANALYSIS AND RF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS HAVE BEEN EXECUTED TO CONFIRM THAT THERE IS NO OTHER INTERFERENCE OR RF EXPOSURE HAZARD ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED FACILITY. THE ATTACHED MAP INDICATES THAT THE CHANNEL 23 FACILITY 51 DBU CONTOUR IS ALSO WITHIN THE CONTOUR OF THE WDVB FACILITY.

THE INTERFERENCE ANALYSIS WAS EXECUTED USING THE TV PROCESS 2010 SOFTWARE IMPLEMENTING THE OET-69 METHODOLOGY RUNNING ON A SUN WORKSTATION.
IF THIS PROPOSED FACILITY STA IS GRANTED, THE PREVIOUS STA (20130214ABZ) CAN BE DISMISSED AS IT WOULD NO LONGER BE REQUIRED.

Attachment 45
Description
RF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS
Coverage Map Showing STA Contour is within WDVB protected contour
Interference Analysis